Appendix 2: Initial equality impact assessment screening form This form records an equality screening process to determine the relevance of equality to a proposal, and a decision whether or not a full EIA would be appropriate or proportionate.
|
|||||||
Directorate |
Community Development |
||||||
Service area |
Planning |
||||||
Proposal being screened |
North Yorkshire Local Development Scheme |
||||||
Officer(s) carrying out screening |
Rachael Hutton |
||||||
What are you proposing to do? |
To recommend to Executive the publication of the council’s Local Development Scheme, which includes key milestones for the preparation of the new Local Plan for North Yorkshire, completion of the Maltkiln New Settlement DPD and Selby Local Plan, and the review of the Minerals and Waste Joint Plan. |
||||||
Why are you proposing this? What are the desired outcomes? |
The preparation of a Local Development Scheme is a statutory requirement as set out in the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. |
||||||
Does the proposal involve a significant commitment or removal of resources? Please give details. |
The budget implications for delivering the LDS will be considered through the Council’s budget setting process. |
||||||
Impact on people with any of the following protected characteristics as defined by the Equality Act 2010, or NYC’s additional agreed characteristics As part of this assessment, please consider the following questions: · To what extent is this service used by particular groups of people with protected characteristics? · Does the proposal relate to functions that previous consultation has identified as important? · Do different groups have different needs or experiences in the area the proposal relates to?
If for any characteristic it is considered that there is likely to be an adverse impact or you have ticked ‘Don’t know/no info available’, then a full EIA should be carried out where this is proportionate. You are advised to speak to your directorate representative for advice if you are in any doubt.
|
|||||||
Protected characteristic |
Potential for adverse impact |
Don’t know/No info available |
|||||
Yes |
No |
||||||
Age |
|
ü |
|
||||
Disability |
|
ü |
|
||||
Sex |
|
ü |
|
||||
Race |
|
ü |
|
||||
Sexual orientation |
|
ü |
|
||||
Gender reassignment |
|
ü |
|
||||
Religion or belief |
|
ü |
|
||||
Pregnancy or maternity |
|
ü |
|
||||
Marriage or civil partnership |
|
ü |
|
||||
|
|||||||
People in rural areas |
|
ü |
|
||||
People on a low income |
|
ü |
|
||||
Carer (unpaid family or friend) |
|
ü |
|
||||
Are from the Armed Forces Community |
|
ü |
|
||||
Does the proposal relate to an area where there are known inequalities/probable impacts (for example, disabled people’s access to public transport)? Please give details. |
No |
||||||
Will the proposal have a significant effect on how other organisations operate? (for example, partners, funding criteria, etc.). Do any of these organisations support people with protected characteristics? Please explain why you have reached this conclusion. |
No |
||||||
Decision (Please tick one option) |
EIA not relevant or proportionate: |
ü
|
Continue to full EIA: |
|
|||
Reason for decision |
An impact screening assessment has been undertaken and this concludes that proposals are in place to ensure that as many people as possible are made aware of and are engaged with the consultation. The Local Plan will have its own Equalities Impact Assessment. |
||||||
Signed (Assistant Director or equivalent) |
Trevor Watson |
||||||
Date |
22/01/2024 |
||||||